ChatGPT and other popular AI tools can be surprisingly helpful in a growing number of areas, especially when it comes to brainstorming ideas, looking for simple facts, and editing text.
However, could artificial intelligence be a reliable companion in scientific research?
Enago Academy comes with a clear answer: Certainly not! In an article 9 Things Researchers Shouldn’t Expect From ChatGPT the author discusses the areas of competence that AI can never do for a researcher.
These key areas are:
1. Providing original research ideas.
2. Interpreting complex data analysis.
3. Engaging in academic peer review.
4. Providing real-time feedback on research progress.
5. Generating comprehensive literature reviews.
6. Writing research proposals or grant applications.
7. Developing new experimental methodologies.
8. Making ethical decisions in research.
9. Contributing to scientific breakthroughs.
💬 So keep researching, keep writing! No AI can ever replace the human expertise in research and academic writing.
The analysis is accompanied by a handy chart. Click on it to see it enlarged.
Source: 9 Things Researchers Shouldn’t Expect From ChatGPT – Enago Academy Blog
Geek Updated 
Leave a Reply